The state of being iconic


Photographer: Vanessa Mills. Model: myself  Designer: Sparklewren

A recent conversation with a friend forced me to rethink the widespread use of the word 'iconic'. Once upon a time 'iconic' was a term mostly used by art historians and with reference to images of Christ, the Virgin Mary, or saints, as found  in Orthodox churches. Or to Byzantine art.
Then came the use of the word in the sense of cultural icons, with reference to very famous faces and characters such as, in no particular order and by no means limited to these names,  Che Guevara, Elvis Presley, Marilyn Monroe, Jim Morrison and brands, such as Coca Cola.
We are now inundated with icons and iconic objects. Victoria Beckhams' designs are iconic and she is regarded as an icon of style and  brands, apart from the already mentioned Coca Cola, are also iconic.  Views from the veranda of a luxury hotel are iconic, Californian red elmwood is iconic, basically everything including iPhone/iPad apps, is iconic. Of course I know that those little images on Apple computers are called 'icons' and have been called so for a very long time, but this post is not about those. Apple by the way, as a brand, is also iconic.
Some people complain of an  'overuse' of the word iconic. Is there really an overuse?
So it is that while sipping our iconic cappuccinos, my friend and I began to consider what cultural icons, or better still, the state of being iconic, or iconicity,  is  about.
Let's refer first to the Oxford English Dictionary, which defines icon as "a person or thing regarded as a representative symbol or as worthy of veneration". From there iconicity would then refer to the state of being this representative symbol or  symbol of veneration.  This is a broad definition that allows us to throw in some interesting variants. So if we think of cultural icons we can agree that they are not only representative symbols, they often personify them. So far, so good.
But the dictionary does not tell us about the process of becoming or establishing something as a cultural icon.  And this is quite important and perhaps knowing about it can allow us to understand the discontent of those who believe that we are iconizing everything (yes, the word exists, it is American English).

Photographer: Vanessa Mills. Model: myself. Designer: Sparklewren

The crux of the matter, as my friend was quick to point, is that if iconicity in cultural terms is to do with the non-discursive and non-verbal element of cultural and social life, it is also the case that it is linked with consumerism. It is to do with branding and marketing strategies, thus a hotel view becomes iconic through the branding of the tourist industry.
Iconicity creates consensus, in markets, culture or politics, as Woddward and Elliott write in Iconic Power: materiality and meaning in social life.
Well, these are some initial thoughts, would love to continue to explore the issue but not in just one post. Comments always welcome.

Comments

  1. Icons, in classical usage, are meant to direct attention and worship to something other and greater than themselves; that's why those cute little symbols on our smartphones and computers are called icons, since they direct us to what they represent. But cultural "icons" like Marilyn, Elvis, Morrison et al should really be called *idols,* since they are in fact the objects of what passes for worship in many folks. -- Of course, we no longer worship idols. *lol*

    ReplyDelete
  2. I saw one more today. Iconic croissants at a 'Euphorium Bakery'. There you are.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmmm...Maybe neither icon nor idol, but *epitome.* "Icon" see ;) croissants being epitomes of croissant-ness, but never icons pointing to some God or Goddess of Croissantdom, nor even (much as I like them) idols to worship and bring sacrifices to... This goes to show how careless we English-speakers have gotten with our language, and how little we think of the power of words.

      Delete
  3. I suppose that it can be viewed as the cultural and social shift of a word's meaning over time ("villain" is one of the classic examples), but the aspect of commercialism is an interesting factor. If commercial aspects are our current default method of encountering and making sense of the world around us (as religion once was) then the aspects of how "icons" represent ideals, understandings and meaning are through that lens. As jachanaan mentions, we conflate icon and idol with regard to many celebrities in that the personality becomes synonymous with ideals and select memory. Elvis is the young cocky singer of the sixties, or alternately as the jump-suited debauched addicted figure of his late years... never both as one man, representing the nostalgic or the cynical. Che appears on T-shirts and posters as a commercial entity (too ironic for words) as the tragic messianic rebel rather than the official state torturer for Castro's regime.

    Increasingly, though, this idealist aspect of how we interpret images bears an increasing similarity to the computer "icons" in that symbolic representation takes on an increasing complexity... and yet often a finite message as well, like a program. While the view from a hotel room is iconic in transposing an idealized experience available for the right price, it is rather like the ad for a hamburger that is uncooked, covered with shoe polish and larger than the one obtained in the restaurant... deliberately unreal, and that unreality is an inherent part of the symbolic message - understood and accepted even as it is "ignored".

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment