Real life stories or Exhibitionism part II

Photographer: David Nuttall

One of my earlier posts was about modelling and exhibitionism. Unbearable Lightness has also posted on this topic thus adding more food for thought (and check out the very latest post too, that is also on exhibitionism). Yet exhibitionism qua exhibitionism continues to be most intriguing. The more I read about it the more I am convinced that to view it negatively is inapproriate, we need to look at how it manifests itself and for what purpose, in other words, here it comes again, we need to see it in context.
Blogs themselves can apparently foster exhibitionism (in my view positive because it is meant to facilitate communication) - the blogging style is such that one is allowed to share parts of one's life (and some view this as exhibitionism, I have certainly been accused of indulging in it simply because I write a blog). The degree of veracity in such sharing is very subjective, contextually appropriate, I would say. Personally if I refer to others I try to keep their identities hidden, unless they are happy to be identified. Occasionally I get it wrong and some people ask me to remove their names. Or they go through the whole blog post and then write in their own journal, with fake anger,  that THEY were the source of inspiration, look what they have to put up with - thus drawing everyone's attention to it, is this not an inverted form of exhibitionism?
The blog as a genre occupies a place between the essay and the journal. One writes for oneself but also for a reader, real or imagined. In fact, one always writes for a reader, as soon as one's writing is structured. Only the free flowing  handwritten stream of consciousness type of journals are intimate notebooks with personal thoughts, drawings and so on. In psychotherapy, clients are encouraged to keep a journal for themselves, not to be shared with anyone, not even with the therapist. Personally I find it a little daunting, I much prefer to communicate with someone and imagine myself speaking to this person when I write, the free flowing style does not suit me.
That said, today I would like to consider yet another type of exhibitionism, one which is often derided and yet has become a thriving industry. I mean the 'real life story', the print counterpart of the Jerry Springer show or even Oprah, not to mention Big Brother.
I recently bumped into an old friend, someone whom I had not seen in years. He used to work as an editor for one of Murdoch's newspapers back in the 1990s, subsequently lost his job, and freelanced. He now has a massive contact list and no longer writes for anyone but trains journalists and is enjoying it because, lucky him, he keeps on  being invited to do short intensive courses in sunny climes. When I met him he was on his way to Malaysia. We had lunch at a posh restaurant and I managed to get a bit drunk in the middle of the day -tut, tut.
The paper he used to work for back then was not exactly a broadsheet. I used to tease this English Lit Oxford grad for the absurd headlines, only realising after some time that to come up with those you need a great deal of imagination and a good command of the English language. So it helps to have poured over Chaucer. I used to be very judgmental of the so called 'gutter press', now I find it entertaining and when I go to my local Chinese takeaway I unashamedly go through the Daily Star while waiting. Stories about celebrities having sex romps abound, footballers in particular seem to be easily lured into 'kiss and tell' with hookers - and their fans love reading about it, with all the sordid details. Stories about politicians involved in sex scandals also abound - exposing extramarital sex  is still  one of the best ways  to discredit a politician. Remember Paddy 'Pantsdown' Ashdown, anyone? Or Profumo and Christine Keeler?
But there are also stories about ordinary people which everyone wants to read about. Someone won a huge amount of money at the lottery and squandered it all or did not find happiness i.e wife left and various other disasters -  the average reader wants nothing but to feel quite superior in the knowledge that "money does not bring happiness". Someone was reunited with a long lost childhood sweetheart after various tribulations. Someone may have undergone a really scary experience with the stalker from hell - the  replays of Fatal Attraction I have gone through while browsing such stories are countless, that was a movie that somehow firmly embedded itself in the viewers' psyche and keeps on being referenced (I loved Glen Close, not so keen on Michael Douglas though, he never did it for me).  These are stories which  appear in weekly magazines, the kind you find when waiting at the doctor'or at the dentist's or your local takeaway, 'real life' stories which will entertain you for a short while. Sometimes the stories are illustrated with pictures of models (and the caption clearly says so; I modelled for one of them, not exactly my best modelling job).
Photographer: David Nuttall
My friend is an adept at writing stories, any story, he always knows the angle and what sells best. The main thing is: it has to be SENSATIONAL. Selling stories to the press, he told me, has become a full blown and rather lucrative business, with groups of journalists, whose job is exclusively to write such stories, setting up consultancies. They research stories or get stories from  anyone who might come forward with something potentially interesting, write them to target specific publications, money is exchanged and readers can enjoy these real life stories and be gratified by them.  They advertise heavily on the internet and in the magazines themselves soliciting further stories about cheating, disasters, family secrets, crime etc etc. A couple of known websites where castings are advertised for entertainers also have a section entitled "Magazines", full of ads for stories.
Of course the stories have to resonate with the readership. They need to be told in a certain way.  As a general rule there has to be something that catches the reader's attention and makes him or her, especially her (most of these publications are women's weeklies not of the Vogue or Tatler variety where the gossip is strictly about "those who matter" and much more sophisticated), want to read on.  Cheating and betrayal, stalking and sexual harassment always do well but the characters have to be highly dramatised, there has to be a threat to your life, possibly a rape or an attempted rape, that kind of thing. If it  is about stalking  the stalker should be motivated by passion and lust, someone who stalks you because you owe them money does not make the story sufficiently attractive to the  readership - female readers want some hint of romance, stories of people in debt and of thuggish debt collectors are really not what they want to know about.  What if your story is not that sensational? why, you can  make it sensational,  by adding certain touches - not exactly lying, just being economical with the truth. The professional journalist will do it all for you.
Is the money paid good, I asked. My friend smiled. It depends on who is involved and how well you can negotiate, he said. Celebs, politicians, millionaires will get you straight into the Sun or News of the World, lesser mortals might get you into a weekly. But does it have to be true? Hmm, what is truth? Let's say it has to be outrageously unbelievable and yet have a foundation of truth. It's the way you recount the events that matters. What about libel? There are ways of getting around that. If you are naming and shaming, the other party will also be interviewed for verification but most publications have very good lawyers. The contract you sign with them makes you liable rather than them. Besides people do not often pursue a lawsuit because it could be far too expensive.  In the case of celebs they do sue but the publication is prepared for that and there is usually an out of court settlement. It is a big bucks industry.
Photographer: Marcello Pozzetti
But who sells these stories and why? Anyone. Money is an incentive of course, people get paid for baring their souls. Then the pleasure of having your fifteen minutes, with your picture in the mag - often a photoshoot with a makeover thrown in is organised, that in itself could be a payment if the story is too cheap - to be worthy of being paid some money for the story your cheating boyfriend should at the very least have performed a couple of stunts i.e tried to sleep with your mum and your dog  possibly at the same time, otherwise it is going to be an utterly boring read.  The degree of sensationalism will determine the fee.
Interesting. Come to think, I told him, as our lunch was coming to a close and I could feel the effect of the fine wine we drank, I know of a model and a photographer, in fact several models and a photographer, there is lust, stalking, attempted rape...  How much do you reckon that will get me?
Watch out for my Exhibitionism part III. It will be in one of my next posts.
(All photos modelled by Alex B.)


Comments

  1. Exhibitionism (look at me) was used by the singer Madonna to promote her career. Bad press is better than no press, and she ran with it. You have to get their attention before they will notice you. No one sees you if you walk on the sidewalk. If you walk in the street or walk on someone’s lawn then you get noticed. Following the road most traveled gets you a seat in the audience, not the stage. I hate to admit it but I first read your blog because their was a nude picture of you next to the text. It there wasn’t one I may have easily moved on.
    Now, I don’t think that makes you an exhibitionist, because I was searching for photography blogs and have to except whatever is behind the next door. But, the viewer does not determine who or what the seen person is. That person is that person. Self determination. An actor becomes an exhibitionist when she up stages the others, not when she gets on stage.
    I’m not arguing a point with you. I’m just reacting to your words.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for continuing to read my blog. You are right about Madonna and yes to get famous you have to get noticed. There is nothing intrinsically wrong about wanting to be centre stage if one when one is centre stage the performance is good. After all someone has to be centre stage!
    Exhibitionism is my topic at the moment. I am definitely intrigued by it and I do not regard it negatively.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't think that I've ever intended something I created to be only for myself. I can't imagine writing a diary/journal without intending that it be read by some audience.
    I couldn't write a song for my own listening pleasure alone.

    As private a person as I am, I simply cannot conceive of any outward, performative, or creative activity like writing or photography to be for my eyes only. Others may feel differently, but I simply can't imagine it. I can imagine the impulse to hide, but not simply to keep something to myself.

    On the subject of 'real life stories':
    They bore me.
    I've been in a few upsetting arguments with someone close to me about the validity of non-fiction as a form of entertainment.
    I just don't see any reason to read a story whose plot elements are confined to the real.

    Personal dramas bore and annoy me. There's a genre of film that I simply cannot stand, which - while it may be a fictional script - seems to boil down to 2 hours of a family fighting all the time, and eventually something happens that makes some character realize some big overdone moral.

    There's just no reason I can think of to expose myself to the kind of upsetting family arguments that I could easily experience by hanging around with my own family.

    I think exposing that - it's exhibitionism, and the worst kind - because it's pointless. If I can experience it, then I don't need to read/watch/hear it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Totally agree with the first half of your comment. We write and do other creative things to communicate with someone even if only with an unseen someone.
    As for reality stories, I used to be very much against the genre - I used to tell Richard, my friend, that he was wasting his degree in English Lit by writing and attending to such trash - little did I know! but now I view them with a smile and scrutinise the plots. I look at how the stories are constructed. There is dramatic tension.There is retribution. It is actually the same kind of dramatic tension I see in 19th century ballets - have been watching La Bayadere as I have to teach it tomorrow in critical appreciation class. I love the way these writers - and they do know how to write - create a story out of reality and they are outrageously funny. There is humour in drama, a lot more than people are actually willing to admit. I laugh at family dramas, not out of condescension but because they are silly, in the larger scheme of things and always laugh at anyone who takes himself/herself too seriously

    ReplyDelete
  5. This post reminds me of a lecture I attended at an academic conference in York, England, in 1993. The title of it was "Consuming Ourselves." Two scholars approached the idea of capitalist consumption from the standpoint we had nothing more to sell in an overly saturated marketplace except ourselves and predicted people would begin selling themselves via talk shows and tell-alls. The audience would then be consuming the lives of others.

    Of course that has come to pass. We are in a stage of commercial self-consumption.

    When I write fiction, of course I use my own life and experiences as the basis for my work. But fiction and non-fiction as two distinctly different genre, and literature and formulaic commercial work are clearly two different categories as well.

    My embarrassment and discomfort with the idea of "exhibitionism" comes from the fact that as a model I consider myself a performing artist and as a writer I consider myself a literary writer, and that includes my blog What We Saw Today. While it is a journal of sorts, so was Hemingway's "A Moveable Feast."

    In American usage the word "exhibitionist" bespeaks pornography not fine art and the Jerry Springer Show vs. "A Moveable Feast."

    So I hope that explains where I'm coming from. Great post, Alex. I am also fascinated with this discussion and think it is all more complex than people realized.

    ReplyDelete
  6. There's a reason those editors insist on a certain format and certain "details:" they know what sells, that is, what excites people. "Real" sex and violence is much more exciting to readers/listeners/viewers than mere financial skullduggery.

    But the moment you begin to write down a series of events, it becomes a story. Stories by their nature attempt to explicate inexplicable things, and also follow certain conventions. (And these storytelling techniques became conventions precisely because they worked; that is, they excited people. :) ) So it doesn't surprise me that these "reality" stories tend to follow a certain format.

    ReplyDelete
  7. UL thank you for adding to my post. I began this exploration of exhibitionism tentatively, you contributed substantially to the discussion and I thank you for it. Now the topic truly intrigues me and I will post again on it though not immediately.
    Selling one's own life story and turning oneself into an object of consumption: there is something perverse in it but it is also fascinating to see how the stories are constructed, manufactured is not an inappropriate word here. It then becomes something quite different and yes, it becomes fiction. The next step wpould be to turn them into novels and sometimes people do, theeby effecting a further transformation.
    Jochanaan you are so right about story telling conventions. Reality stories do follow a format and I have begun to appreciate the skill that goes into making one. The dramatic element has to be emphasised , the unhappiness, even if it is overcome by subsequent events, has to be stressed. As Tolstoy said "Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way".

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment