Photographer: Elisabeth Jacobsen
First of all, I woud like to issue an apology. R. if you are reading this, please know that I am very sorry for overreacting and I really did not realise I would cause you distress. I did not appreciate that you were paying me a great compliment.
What happened made me come to terms with the fact that as a model my images are in the public domain. People may come across them and they may post them on their Facebook pages simply because they like them. They may not know who the woman in those images is and ultimately it does not matter. If they credit the photographer it is absolutely fine for them to use the photos - not to sell them, not to impersonate anyone but simply because they like them. I have myself used images of beautiful sunsets or landscapes, which I have found inspirational, in this very blog, and those images had not been taken by me nor was I modelling for them.
I am very careful about crediting photographers and also models, because I know that models love being credited, but I am also aware that it is not a real requirement to credit models, only a nice gesture of acknowledgement.
Photographer: David Newby for The Guardian
So when I discovered that a member of a Facebook group to which I belong had used one of my pictures as a cover, I fired off a stern message believing she was up to no good. It turned out that she had simply found the image inspiring.
I have also realised that I still have a big problem about accepting a compliment graciously, there is this little voice inside me that tells me that no, it cannot be true, something has to be wrong. A lot of work to do, it seems!
Thank you, anonymous Facebook friend, for teaching me an important lesson. And thank you for liking my photos and for acknowledging me as 'your inspiration'. I am really touched.
(Photos modelled by Alex B.)
The matter of copyright is interesting when it involves idea and images. An artist asked me recently if I could print her some images that she had sourced on the internet for her to use as subject matter for paintings. I suggested that the copyright in the image was the photographer's and not hers.
ReplyDeleteI know of a case of an artist who copied a photograph that was used as an advertisement for a champagne house. The photographer got to hear about it, complained and the painting was returned to the gallery for refund.
The latter photograph had had paid models and stylists and hairdressers and the copyright belonged to the photographer and client.
Of course many people put images on the net to be used and that's fine too, but the dividing line can be hard to find.
Best
Hugh